SMU 4, Kentucky 0 (F)
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:24 pm15:28 GOAL by SMU CHEVANNES, Adrian
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:24 pmPosted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:26 pmGo Stangs Go
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:27 pmTrue football
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:27 pmWait, who cares about soccer?
Ok ok.. I do.
Ok ok.. I do.
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:34 pmCome on now this is our one #1 sport plus Schellas is a helluva guy
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:47 pm42:00 GOAL by SMU HARWELL, Jeff, Assist by WILEMAN, Chase
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:54 pmHalftime, SMU up 2-zip.
SMU: 2 goals, 8 shots, 0 saves, 6 corners, 11 fouls, 0 offsides
Kentucky: 0 goals, 1 shot, 2 saves, 0 corners, 8 fouls, 1 offside
SMU: 2 goals, 8 shots, 0 saves, 6 corners, 11 fouls, 0 offsides
Kentucky: 0 goals, 1 shot, 2 saves, 0 corners, 8 fouls, 1 offside
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 7:56 pmWoo Woo! Go Stangs Go!
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:00 pmWhat a solid team. Much better than the #1 team a few years back. I thought they were a bit overrated. This team seems to be the real deal.
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:36 pmGametracker finally updated.
51:18 GOAL by SMU GUARDA, Bruno, Assist by OLIVA, Richard and CHEVANNES, Adrian
63:41 GOAL by SMU SAINTUS, Dario, Assist by GRANT, Stephen
4-zip
51:18 GOAL by SMU GUARDA, Bruno, Assist by OLIVA, Richard and CHEVANNES, Adrian
63:41 GOAL by SMU SAINTUS, Dario, Assist by GRANT, Stephen
4-zip
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:56 pmVery impressive!!
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:23 pmVery good performance by SMU. GK Wideman was involved in a hard collision early in the second half but kept playing. Tough kid.
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:37 pmThat wasn't one of those collisions where someone blinks at a goalie and gets a yellow card. They nailed each other. Kentucky is a pretty good team, and still had no business being on the same field with SMU. (Got to like the kid who got the red card for Kentucky -- he just got off the bench, and got tossed in less than a minute. I wonder if he even needs to shower after a game like that?)
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 9:49 amSmooPower wrote:Halftime, SMU up 2-zip.
SMU: 2 goals, 8 shots, 0 saves, 6 corners, 11 fouls, 0 offsides
Kentucky: 0 goals, 1 shot, 2 saves, 0 corners, 8 fouls, 1 offside
Smoo:
This is a sincere question from a soccer idiot. You have listed the number of offsides in your stats. Is that relative to the game in any way? If there is a tie game does the number of offsides have any bearing on anything? I can understand the interest in every other stat but not that one. We do not list the number of offsides in American football separately. Again, this is a legitimate question. I am one that can not get enough stats so I appreciate them but just wondering if there is any sgnificance in the offsides. Thanks.
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 1:26 pmHonestly, the number of offsides and corner kicks means very little, but could have a slight impact on the rankings. Each is an indication of whether a team is playing aggressive soccer, trying to push forward and score. For instance, if the box score of a game shows that a team had no corners and no offsides violations, that's a pretty good indication that the team involved was content to simply pack the entire team in front of its own net and play for the tie.
So, if that team is ranked in the same range as another team that plays a tie game against a similar opponent, but the second team has 10 corner kicks and 14 offsides violations. Voters could use that statistic to determine that the second team is more aggressively trying to win, and therefore might sway a vote or two in the polls.
Othherwise, it means damn little.
So, if that team is ranked in the same range as another team that plays a tie game against a similar opponent, but the second team has 10 corner kicks and 14 offsides violations. Voters could use that statistic to determine that the second team is more aggressively trying to win, and therefore might sway a vote or two in the polls.
Othherwise, it means damn little.